Habitats

Working paper on the economic valuation of country St. Maarten's coral reef resources

The St. Maarten Nature Foundation conducted an Economic Valuation of St. Maarten’s coral reef ecosystems in the fall of 2010. This attempted to put a monetary estimate on the coral reefs surrounding the island. Coral Reefs are one of the island’s most valuable resources; they provide a livelihood through dive tourism and fishery and provide protection from large, damaging waves caused by hurricanes. In order to properly manage the coral reef ecosystem, an economic valuation is a useful tool to determine what exactly the monetary value of a coral reef is. With an attached value, better management decisions can be made to adequately protect this most precious of resources.

In order to complete the study four questionnaires were distributed. Two dealt specifically with fisheries, one with hotel accommodations, and one with dive tourism. Data was also provided through independent research and stakeholder analysis. Coral reefs have direct and indirect influences on a wide range of economic factors, and the generation of data was crucial to the successful completion of this study. Data was inputted into a computer program created by the United Nations Environment Program and the World Resource Institute (WRI) and which was adjusted by the St. Maarten Nature Foundation to reflect St. Maarten’s unique ecological and economic situation.

The findings of this study have outlined that St. Maarten’s coral reef resources provide important goods and services to the economy of the island. The revenue that the resource is able to generate through coral reef associated tourism and fishery is approximately USD $57,586,976. Although this number is high, and highlights the importance of coral reefs to the island, it also suggests that there is an increased need for conservation in order for this value not to diminish. It is therefore in the best interest of St. Maarten to incorporate environmental economic data to: (1) Establish Marine Protected Area, (2) Incorporate economic valuation into EIAs, (3) Include economic impacts in assessing fines for damages to coral reefs from activities such as anchoring in the reserves, oil spills etc, (4) Weigh revenues from a growing tourism industry against long-term economic losses from environmental impacts, (5) Evaluate distributional effects (“winners” and “losers”) of proposed coastal development projects, (6) Invest in Scientific Research, (7) Increase support from the private and public sector in the proposed Marine Park Management Authority, St. Maarten Nature Foundation. 

Date
2010
Data type
Research report
Theme
Research and monitoring
Geographic location
St. Maarten
Author

Climate change effects on the biodiversity of the BES islands

In this report we review and assess possible consequences of climate change for the biodiversity of the Dutch BES islands (Bonaire, Saba and St. Eustatius), and present various options for adaptation. From our review it is quite clear that climate change not only poses a severe threat to the ecosystems of the BES islands, but also to the totality of benefits and services the inhabitants of these islands derive from those ecosystems. Key changes in climate expected this century include increases in air and sea surface temperature, an increase in sea level and ocean acidity, an increase in the frequency and intensity of storms and hurricanes, general aridification and greater overall unpredictability in weather. The consequences for both terrestrial and marine biodiversity are predicted to be far-reaching. The principal effects will likely include further losses to the coral reef systems, erosion of coasts and beaches, salinification of ground water sources, losses in hilltop vegetation and flora, soil humus losses and erosion, increases in various disease vectors, changes in ocean currents, fish recruitment and migration, and a stronger foothold for invasive species.

The main areas of environmental policy involving the management of biodiversity are those of land-use planning and zoning, forestry and terrestrial conservation, and marine conservation. As for land-use planning and zoning, main issues of concern will be the introduction of the 'set back' policy for coastal development, the preservation of the full range of key habitats, and sufficient habitat surface area to sustain minimum viable populations for native species. In addition these habitats must be ecologically connected to allow free movement of animals across the habitats they need throughout the different seasons of the year and phases of their life cycle. In terms of forestry and terrestrial conservation policy, the focus will especially need to be on solving the problem of uncontrolled grazing of livestock, and the implementation of reforestation and groundwater conservation. Key issues in marine conservation policy will be to tackle the technically and financially challenging problem of eutrophication and the socially controversial limits to the harvest of reef organisms.

While it is the large industrialized countries that drive man-induced climate change, it is the small island developing states (SIDS) and small coastal states that will suffer the most from climate change. In this respect it may be especially valuable for the BES islands to develop and participate in larger efforts to convince (pressure, lobby) the large industrialized nations to adopt those changes needed in their industrial and energy policies by which to avert the most disastrous scales of global climate change. As the stakes are obviously very high, the BES islands should seek to actively develop and/or participate in such efforts. However, to do this credibly and convincingly will require the islands to develop their own vision and policy and to implement important measures of their own. While the topic of climate change has recently come to the attention of government, preparation and readiness for climate change lags behind.

The main options for local adaptation measures as outlined all come down to just one principle: to 'manage for resilience' of the ecosystems as much as possible by reducing the stress induced by local anthropogenic pressures. This will require proper data and knowledge as well as a proper monitoring of impacts and results. In this, investment in baseline inventories, dedicated research and a monitoring system is essential.

If international resolve falters and precipitous global climatic change cannot ultimately be avoided, large ecological regime shifts may cause ecosystems and species in any given area to become ecologically untenable, and introduced species to become firmly established and impossible to eradicate. If so, it will be important to make hard choices and not waste valuable time and resources fighting lost causes. Therefore, in the future successful management of natural resources will often require managers and decisions makers to think differently than in the past, to abandon old paradigms and objectives, and to focus more on general ecosystem services than on specific details. Hence our ability and willingness to adaptively 'manage for change' will be critical, as will be the need for effective decision making under conditions of complexity, uncertainty and imperfect knowledge.

Date
2010
Data type
Research report
Theme
Research and monitoring
Report number
C118/10
Geographic location
Bonaire
Saba
St. Eustatius

Naturalised and invasive alien plant species in the Caribbean Netherlands: status, distribution, threats, priorities and recommendations

Abstract:

The Netherlands are signatories of the international Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). This implies that the nation will protect biodiversity on its territory. This includes the protection of natural fauna and vegetation from negative impact caused by invasive alien species (see 2.1. for a definition). By 10-10-2010 the BES islands (Bonaire, St Eustatius and Saba) became ‘special municipalities’ of the Netherlands. They together form “Caribisch Nederland” (Caribbean Netherlands, Hulanda Karibe). Due to this stronger link to the Netherlands many responsibilities have moved from the Antillean government to the Netherlands. This includes important responsibilities with respect to the protection of nature.

The present study was financed by the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation and included a literature study, a field trip and writing of the present document with main observations, conclusions and recommendations. A major part of the report consists of an alphabetical list of (known) invasives with their current status (4.1.1.). Apart from the three islands belonging to Caribisch Nederland, for completeness, some attention is given to Aruba, Curacao and St. Maarten as well (esp. in 4.1.1. and Appendix II).

Stages of invasion
In order to define the problem of invasive alien (non-native) species of plants more accurately it is relevant to recognise the following categories:

Exotic: Species that are not part of the natural indigenous vegetation are called exotics. Examples are introductions as ornamental or agricultural species. If contained within the confines of gardens and farms, these species are not considered problematic.

Established: Species that occur ‘in the wild’, i.e. outside the control of cultivation or husbandry and are able to reproduce themselves resulting in new individuals, we call established (present). Species can stay in this phase, the ‘lag phase’ (see 2.1), for quite some time. It is the stage in which the species adapts to its new environment using its genetic flexibility. At this stage complete eradication is still an option, because the number of individuals and locations is limited. This means that the costs can be relatively low, compared to eradication at a later stage.

Naturalised: If given enough time, species may start to adapt genetically to the new environment, by optimising its physiology and/or growth habit. As a result the species will start spreading more rapidly and effectively and becoming part of the natural flora. In most cases this is not considered a major problem; the plants will get their own function within the ecology of the island and will not replace indigenous species entirely. Moreover, the costs of complete eradication have become prohibitive at this stage, so only containment is an option.

Invasive: It is generally believed that about one in one thousand exotics becomes really problematic, e.g. with respect to environmental, ecological or economical impact (Williamson 1995). They start to grow out of control, massively invade natural habitats and reduce or eliminate native species. They have broken down the dispersal barrier and have become invasive. At this stage one can only try to achieve a stage of equilibrium, of mitigation, by intensive control measures. These are usually limited by financial resources, and can normally only be successful with commitment of the local society, e.g. shown by the enthusiastic support and hand labour of many volunteers.

Invasives of the Caribbean Netherlands
In this report 65 species of invasives are enumerated (4.1.1.) with their history and properties, based on a literature survey and completed with experience and findings of the authors. Four of the main problematic species are treated more extensively in 4.1.2. These are the Coral vine (Antigonon leptopus) which poses a great threat to nature, especially in St. Eustatius; the Rubber vine (Cryptostegia grandiflora) which is able to overgrow and smother shrubs and trees and is especially spreading on the Leeward Islands; the neem tree (Azadirachta indica) which is planted for shade and medicinal purposes, but is escaping on Bonaire; and ‘Donna grass’ (Bothriochloa pertusa) which is a very problematic species replacing the more palatable local grasses on the Windward Islands, most notably on St. Eustatius.

In a complementary list a further 80 species that need more investigation are mentioned (4.1.3.). This list is not complete but it enumerates species that are present on at least one of the islands. They need special attention because it is best to prevent them from entering at all or to eliminate the few plants or populations that have established themselves. Some species in this list are already present at some scale, like some of the arable weeds, but need careful monitoring to prevent them from entering nature.

A general problem are the free-roaming animals, cows, donkeys and especially goats (all non- native species) that are destroying nature in an uncontrolled way. Their presence has a detrimental effect on biodiversity, eating young seedlings and trees, and thereby preventing the natural regeneration and succession. Moreover, the bare soils that result are susceptible to water and wind erosion; material that is deposited in the surrounding seas.

Management recommendations:

Before an exotic has been introduced prevention is the most important action, i.e. keep the chance that exotic species may be introduced as low as possible. As soon as a first introduction has been realised and the exotic still occurs at low densities at few sites, eradication after first observation will be the most important action. Finally, if an exotic has already spread over different sites or even different habitats and has increased in densities, eradication might not be an achievable option anymore. Then containment and population management will be the most relevant actions to minimise the negative impact (mitigation). In general, prevention will generate the most cost-effective options to avoid problems due to invasive exotic plants (Davis 2009). The main observations are:

Prevention: Prevention plans need to be developed with regulations restricting the import of exotic species. This includes the development of ‘Black lists’ for the Leeward and Windward Islands respectively. Public awareness (customs and other officials, general public, landscapers, new inhabitants) must be raised and alternatives for imported exotics must be offered. Agricultural departments and customs offices on all islands are understaffed and not able to control the many routes through which exotics enter.

Eradication after first observation: Rapid first observation of an exotic plant after introduction into the wild is essential for the success of an eradication action. Therefore a ‘Watch list’ or ‘Grey List’ needs to be developed. Since the difference in climates, these watch lists will partly differ between islands and differ even more between the Leeward and Windward islands. Also knowledge about the natural flora and invasives must be increased through education, at schools as well as for professionals (rangers, customs personnel, agricultural department, etc.). Floras for the Windward Islands are outdated and not accessible.

Containment/population management: Management plans need to be developed for the control Antigonon, Cryptostegia and neem to be able to stop further spreading and to mitigate the impact on nature. Research on the life cycle of invasives and experiments for their control have to be carried out. The problem of roaming animals must be tackled. Small island communities are not able to do this without outside assistance. If chemical control is considered, special Dutch Caribbean regulations apply based on restricted import permissions for crop protection agents.  

Date
2012
Data type
Research report
Theme
Research and monitoring
Report number
C185/11
Geographic location
Bonaire
Saba
St. Eustatius

The Quill/Boven National Park and Miriam Schmidt Botanical Garden Management Plan 2009

This document will clearly define the V ision, Mission and Goals of The Quill/Boven National Park and Botanical Garden, and s tate the management s trategies which will allow The Q uill/Boven National Park and Botanical Garden successes to be highlighted and its management effectiveness to be assessed. It will also assis t both staff and Board by providing a solid framework for re ference, decision making and planning . The management plan will also ensure continuity of management effort and allow s takeholders and other interest groups to understand and participate in the planning process. According to IUCN , management plans are an essential s tep towards ensuring the proper management of protected areas .

This is the second management plan for The Quill/Boven National P ark and Botanical Garden. The firs t management plan (for the Q uill/Boven National Park) was written in 1999 by Staatsbosbeheer for the period 2000-2004. The rapid development of The Q uill/Boven National Park and Botanical Garden and the suc cesses in management have highlighted the need for a strategic document to consolidate management decision making. M anagement planning a nd a clear s trategy for management is a prerequisite if management is going to begin monitoring its own e ffec tivenes s .

Date
2009
Data type
Other resources
Theme
Governance
Geographic location
St. Eustatius

An Assessment of the Health and Resilience of Bonaire’s Coral Reefs

Abstract:

From July 19-26, 2010, a dedicated team of researchers completed transect surveys on 25 reefs located on the leeward side of Bonaire and the adjacent Klein Bonaire to characterize the current status, threats, and resilience of Bonaire’s reefs. The assessments focused on corals, fish, algae and motile invertebrates using belt transects, point intercept methods and photographic documentation, incorporating attributes of the Atlantic and Gulf Rapid Reef Assessment (AGRRA) protocol and the IUCN bleaching resilience protocol. The main purpose of this work was to 1) assess changes in reef structure and health since the last region-wide AGRRA assessments (1998-2000) and other surveys (2001, 2005) by Bruckner; 2) identify sites in excellent health, exhibiting a high biodiversity and cover of reef building corals and an intact fish communities; and 3) characterize the health and resilience of these reefs. The intent of this project was to provide critical information that can assist the Bonaire government and Bonaire Marine Park in the conservation and management of their precious resources.

Between 5-15 m depth, cover of living coral was high on all reefs (approximately 50%), with exception of a few sites impacted by white plague outbreaks and shallow areas scoured by strong waves during previous storms. Cover by fleshy macroalgae was generally low, as compared to reefs in other Caribbean localities, although some deeper sites did have high cover of Lobophora and Dictyota spp. (brown macroalgae), and cyanobacterial mats were prominent in several locations (especially on Klein Bonaire); these algae occasionally carpeted the margins of coral colonies and were competing with living corals. Montastraea annularis (complex) were the dominant corals, in terms of living cover, occupying approximately 20-25% of the benthos, and making up over 50% of the total live coral cover. Agaricia, Madracis and Porites spp. were the other dominant corals, in terms of living cover. M. annularis complex was also most abundant taxa (numbers of colonies) at all sites overall, and also the dominant taxa between 5-10 m depth, while Agaricia was slightly more abundant at 15 m depth. While the proportion (number of colonies) of brooding species (especially Agaricia, Porites) was very high, their contribution to living coral cover was less than M. annularis (complex) because most colonies were small in size.

Based on size structure, abundance, levels of recruitment, and coral condition, coral communities could be divided into two primary groups, the M. annularis complex (M. annularis, M. faveolata and M. franksi) and all other species. Corals lumped into “other species” were small to medium- sized (mean=24 cm), and population structure exhibited a monotonic decline in size; most colonies were < 20 cm in diameter and very few colonies were over 60 cm. Although a small proportion of colonies showed active signs of disease and competition from other biotic stressors, these corals had low levels of partial mortality (8%), few completely dead colonies were observed (0.4%), and they were the predominant species colonizing dead skeletal surfaces of other corals as well as reef substrates.

The original size of M. annularis (complex) colonies was significantly larger (58 cm diameter) than all other species, although many had been reduced in size due to partial mortality and skeletal surfaces of colonies often contained numerous smaller tissue remnants. These corals were being affected to the greatest degree by coral diseases (white plague, yellow band disease, black band disease, dark spots disease) and other biotic stressors, including competition and overgrowth by sponges, encrusting gorgonians, hydrozoan corals and a tunicate, predation by snails and parrotfish, and damselfish algal lawns. Colonies of M. annularis (complex) were missing on average 30% of their tissue, although the largest corals (mean size =61 cm; about 50% of all colonies) exhibited significantly higher amounts of partial mortality (mean loss=50%) than smaller (mean=41 cm) corals (mean tissue loss=11%). The extent of partial mortality, large numbers of completely dead colonies (4.5% of 1602 examined corals), ongoing stressors that continue to plague this taxa, and absence of colonies less than 10 cm in diameter (indicative of a lack of recruitment success) is of serious concern for these reefs, as these are the dominant frame-builders and characteristically the longest lived corals in the western Atlantic. The better overall health and high levels of recruitment observed in other taxa, in combination with recent declines in M. annularis complex, may indicate these reefs are undergoing a shift in species assemblages, with communities being replaced by smaller, shorter lived corals.

Fish communities on Bonaire were relatively high in diversity, with a dominance by herbivores (especially parrotfishes and damselfishes). Many species of important predatory fishes were present, including the dominant western Atlantic species of snapper, grouper, jacks and grunts, although these predatory fishes may be declining as the size structure was dominated by small and medium-sized fish. In particular, grouper over 30 cm total length were very rare. Large- sized groupers are the most important members of the family, as these species change sex (large individuals are females) and the larger fish produce an exponentially higher number of offspring.

In general, Bonaire’s reefs show signs of high resilience and a good ability to recover from acute disturbances. Reefs had high coral cover, low levels of disease, high levels of recruitment, and low amounts of fleshy macroalgae. There are minor problems that need to be addressed through management actions and conservation strategies. This could include 1) a program to eradicate lionfish before their numbers get out of control (these species were seen, but they appear to be rare as compared to other Caribbean Islands); 2) community-based efforts to remove an encrusting tunicate, coral-eating snails, and three-spot damselfish; 3) a nursery/restoration program to propagate A. cervicornis and A. palmata and reintroduce these corals into their former habitat; 4) steps to increase the abundance of herbivorous sea urchin (Diadema antillarum) populations; 5) elimination of fishing on herbivores (parrotfish caught along the shoreline using handlines) and top predators (groupers); and 6) better sewage treatment and other strategies to reduce run-off and nutrient input from hotels located along the coastline. 

Date
2010
Data type
Research report
Theme
Research and monitoring
Geographic location
Bonaire

Scuba diver behaviour and the management of diving impacts on coral reefs

Coral reefs worldwide are attracting increasing numbers of scuba divers, leading to growing concern about damage. There is now a need to manage diver behaviour closely, especially as many dive companies offer unlimited, unsupervised day and night diving from shore. We observed 353 divers in St. Lucia and noted all their contacts with the reef during entire dives to quantify rates of damage and seek ways of reducing it. Divers using a camera caused significantly more contacts with the reef than did those without cameras (mean 0.4 versus 0.1 contacts min-1), as did shore versus boat dives (mean 0.5 versus 0.2 contacts min-1) and night versus day dives (mean 1.0 versus 0.4 contacts min-1). We tested the effect of a one-sentence inclusion in a regular dive briefing given by local staff that asked divers to avoid touching the reef. We also examined the effect of dive leader intervention on rates of diver contact with the reef. Briefing alone had no effect on diver contact rates, or on the probability of a diver breaking living substrate. However, dive leader intervention when a diver was seen to touch the reef reduced mean contact rates from 0.3 to 0.1 contacts min-1 for both shore and boat dives, and from 0.2 to 0.1 contacts min-1 for boat dives. Given that briefings alone are insufficient to reduce diver damage, we suggest that divers need close supervision, and that dive leaders must manage diver behaviour in situ.

Date
2004
Data type
Scientific article
Theme
Research and monitoring

Synthesis of coral reef health indicators for the Western Atlantic: Results of the AGRRA program (1997-2000)

Abstract:

The Atlantic and Gulf Rapid Reef Assessment (AGRRA) sampling strategy is designed to collect both descriptive and quantitative information for a large number of reef vitality indicators over large spatial scales. AGRRA assessments conducted between 1998 and 2000 across a spectrum of western Atlantic reefs with different histories of disturbance, environmental conditions, and fishing pressure were examined to reveal means and variances for 15 indicators. Twenty surveys were compiled into a database containing a total of 302 benthic sites (249 deep, 53 shallow), 2,337 benthic transects, 14,000 quadrats, 22,553 stony corals. Seventeen surveys contained comparable fish data for a total of 247 fish sites (206 deep, 41 shallow), 2,488 fish transects, and 71,102 fishes. Shallow (≤ 5 m) reefs were dominated by A. palmata, a good proportion of which was standing dead, while deep (>5m) reefs were nearly always dominated by the Montastraea annularis species complex. Fish communities were dominated by acanthurids and scarids with seranids making up less than 1% of the fish seen on shallow reefs and 4% on deep reefs.

AGRRA benthic and fish indicators on deep reefs showed the highest variation at the smallest spatial scale (~<0.1 km), with recent mortality and macroalgal canopy height displaying the largest area and subregional scale (~1-100 km) variation. A mean live coral cover of 26% for the 20 survey areas was determined for the deep sites. Significant bleaching and disease-induced mortality of stony corals associated with the 1998 (El Niño-Southern Oscillation) ENSO event were most apparent in the western Caribbean and Bahamas subregions and the Montastraea annularis complex was the most heavily impacted.

The overall low number of sightings for larger-bodied groupers and snappers (~< 1/100 m2) as a whole suggest that the entire region is overfished for many of these more heavily targeted species. More remote reefs showed as much evidence of reef degradation as reefs more proximal to human coastal development. Characterizing present-day reef condition across the region is a complex problem since there are likely multiple sources of stress operating over several spatial and temporal scales. Not withstanding the many limitations of this analysis, the value of making multiple observations across multiple spatial scales that can approximate the “normal” state for the region today is still very high. 

Date
2003
Data type
Scientific article
Theme
Research and monitoring
Author

The Protection and Management of the Sargasso Sea: The golden floating rainforest of the Atlantic Ocean

The Sargasso Sea is a fundamentally important part of the world’s ocean, located within the North Atlantic sub-tropical gyre with its boundaries defined by the surrounding currents. It is the only sea without land boundaries with water depths ranging from the surface coral reefs of Bermuda to abyssal plains at 4500 m. The Sargasso Sea’s importance derives from the interdependent mix of its physical structure and properties, its ecosystems, its role in global scale ocean and earth system processes, its socio-economic and cultural values, and its role in global scientific research. Despite this, the Sargasso Sea is threatened by a range of human activities that either directly adversely impact it or have the potential to do so. Being open ocean, the Sargasso Sea is part of the High Seas, the area of ocean that covers nearly 50% of the earth’s surface but which is beyond the jurisdiction and responsibility of any national government, and as such it enjoys little protection. To promote the importance of the Sargasso Sea, the Sargasso Sea Alliance was created under the leadership of the Government of Bermuda in 2010. This report provides a summary of the scientific and other supporting evidence for the importance of the Sargasso Sea and is intended to develop international recognition of this; to start the process of establishing appropriate management and precautionary regimes within existing agreements; and to stimulate a wider debate on appropriate management and protection for the High Seas.

Nine reasons why the Sargasso Sea is important are described and discussed. It is a place of legend with a rich history of great importance to Bermuda; it has an iconic ecosystem based upon floating Sargassum, the world’s only holopelagic seaweed, hosting a rich and diverse community including ten endemic species; it provides essential habitat for nurturing a wide diversity of species many of which are endangered or threatened; it is the only breeding location for the threatened European and American eels; it lies within a large ocean gyre which concentrates pollutants and which has a variety of oceanographic processes that impact its productivity and species diversity; it plays a disproportionately large role in global ocean processes of carbon sequestration; it is of major importance for global scientific research and monitoring and is home to the world’s longest ocean time series of measurements; it has significant values to local and world-wide economies; and it is threatened by activities including over-fishing, pollution, shipping, and Sargassum harvesting.

Apart from over-fishing many of the threats are potential, with few direct causal relationships between specific activities and adverse impacts. But there is accumulative evidence that the Sargasso Sea is being adversely impacted by human activities, and with the possibility of new uses for Sargassum in the future, the lack of direct scientific evidence does not preclude international action through the established precautionary approach. The opportunity to recognise the importance of the Sargasso Sea and to develop and implement procedures to protect this iconic region and the wider High Seas should be taken before it is too late. 

Date
2011
Data type
Research report
Theme
Governance
Author

Functional Valuation of Ecosystem Services on Bonaire

Abstract:

My thesis research builds on the ‘movement’ to value nature. This movement as I call it started as early as 1970 with a theory to quantify and monetize nature (Hueting, 1970). References to the concept of ecosystem services date back to the mid 1960s and early 1970s (de Groot et al., 2002). A Phd research into the value of nature by De Groot (1992) emphasized the need to “ecologize” economic valuation of ecosystem services by integrating ecological information.

In 2005 the Millenium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA) report used the ecosystem services approach to highlight the importance and drivers of changes of ecosystem service delivery (MEA, 2005). The Economics of Ecosystem services and Biodiversity (TEEB) platform built on the framework of MEA, but specified ecosystems in underlying functions, processes and structures to “ecologize” economic benefits of biodiversity and costs of biodiversity losses (TEEB, 2010a).

Valuation of ecosystem services can be done at three levels, monetary, quantitative and qualitative. Qualitative describes benefits in a non-numerical scale, quantitative measures benefits and changes based on numerical data and monetary builds on quantitative value and attaches a monetary value (White et al., 2011). This research is a semi-quantitative analysis of the functional value of coral reef habitats on Bonaire to support ecosystem services. It is part of an economic valuation study of marine and terrestrial ecosystem services on Bonaire. The economic valuation study estimated a monetary value of selected ecosystem services. My research measured the functional value, defined as the ecological importance of a habitat, on an ordinal scale with four levels (0-3).

The TEEB theoretical framework was applied by studying the underlying ecological functions, processes and structures of coral reefs that determine the capacity to deliver coral reef ecosystem services through a literature review. The functional group approach was used as a measure of the importance of habitats based on the level of representation of fish and coral functional groups. The methodology to analyze the functional value was inspired by a study of Harborne (2006) that established the functional value of Caribbean coral reef, seagrass and mangrove habitats to ecosystem processes.

My research applied this method using Bonaire as case study and adapted the method to determine the functional value of habitats to ecosystem services instead of ecosystem processes. This way the study of Harborne has been taken a step further by making the link between the economic analysis focussing on ecosystem services and the ecological analysis focussing on ecosystem functioning. The other adaptations made were the spatial scale, the habitat types and the data collection method. Harborne determined the value by doing a meta-analysis of empirical literature on processes in ten coral reef, seagrass and mangrove habitat types.

For my research primary data of fish and benthic functional groups were collected at over hundred locations along the entire leeward coast of Bonaire to value just two coral reef habitat types.

Outcome of this research are matrices presenting relationships between socio-economic services and ecological functions, processes and fish and benthic species representing a functional role. Another outcome are maps presenting the functional value of each location to support twelve ecosystem services based on the primary data collected. These maps were analyzed taking into account resource use on Bonaire and show which area are of high importance for each service.

This research is innovative in its attempt to link the economic value of ecosystem services with an ecological value of habitats to support these ecosystem services. In addition the survey of benthic cover and fish biodiversity and abundance has not been done at such a large scale according to our knowledge since the mapping of Bonaire in 1985 (Van Duyl, 1985).

Date
2011
Data type
Research report
Geographic location
Bonaire

Biodiversity of the Saba Bank supports status of Particularly Sensitive Sea Area (PSSA)

Abstract:

This report contains a study regarding the biodiversity of the Saba Bank, one of the three largest atolls in the world. All scientific and anecdotic evidence suggests that the area is a hot spot of biodiversity and one of the few areas in the Caribbean that is still in a relatively pristine condition. The atoll is likely also important as a source of larvae for other areas in the region because of its enormous dimensions and diverse habitats. Major damage however may already be inflicted by the anchoring of large oil tankers. More scientific research is necessary with regards to the damage inflicted by anchoring and to the sustainability of current fishing practices, but to date there is already sufficient data to call for strong protection of the Saba Bank as soon as possible.
Therefore, an application to the International Maritime Organization (IMO) to designate the Saba Bank as a Particularly Sensitive Sea Area (PSSA) in order to prevent possibly irreversible damage to the ecosystem and to enable sustainable protection of it’s vulnerable resources seems crucial and urgent.

This research is performed within ‘Beleidsondersteunend Onderzoek’ (BO-11), cluster NLP of LNV-programs.

Findings:

The main conclusion from this study is that the Saba Bank is a hot spot of biodiversity and one of the few
areas in the Caribbean that is still in a relatively pristine condition. The Bank is likely also important as a source of
larvae for other areas in the region because of its enormous dimensions and diverse habitats.

  • Scientific evidence that the Saba Bank constitutes a major hot spot in marine biodiversity in the Caribbean region has strongly increased over the last couple of years and is now overwhelming.
  • All studies to date express surprise and wonder at the number of different habitats and species within the Saba Bank.
  • With limited sampling effort new species have already been found within the Bank and more are to be expected.
  • The Bank is likely be one of the very few places in the Caribbean that as yet has largely escaped human related pressures and may still be considered as being in a relatively pristine condition.

There is to date already sufficient data to call for strong protection of the Saba Bank as soon as possible. Designating the Saba Bank as a
Particularly Sensitive Sea Area (PSSA) in order to prevent possibly irreversible damage to the ecosystem and to
enable sustainable protection of its vulnerable resources seems crucial and urgent.

Management Recommendations:

  • Study the effects of fishing to ensure that it remains at a sustainable level.
  • Draft and implement a management plan as soon as possible. At present anchoring outside the 12 miles zone is not regulated and anchor damage could be devastating to the whole ecosystem.
  • Carry out more research about the ecological processes of the Saba Bank so as to protect it in the most effective way.
Date
2010
Data type
Research report
Theme
Research and monitoring
Report number
C014/10
Geographic location
Saba bank