Action plan

Species Action Plan Nassau Grouper

Action Plan for Nassau Grouper consists of:

  • Threats: overfishing, invasive species, climate change
  • Management goals
  • Recommendations: management, legislation, enforcement, science and monitoring, stakeholders, networking, information-education
  • Gaps: •population data not available for the Dutch Caribbean, weak island legislation, CITES designation, CMS designation
  • General Information: description and biology
Date
2020
Data type
Other resources
Theme
Governance
Geographic location
Aruba
Bonaire
Saba
Saba bank
St. Maarten
Author
Image

Species Action Plan Mountain mahogany

Action Plan for Mountain mahogany consists of:

  • Threats: storms (hurricanes), climate change, volcanic activity
  • Management goals
  • Recommendations: management, legislation, enforcement, science and monitoring, stakeholders, networking, information-education
  • Gaps: population size, distribution and trends, life history and ecology, morphology data of remaining individuals
  • General Information
Date
2020
Data type
Other resources
Theme
Governance
Geographic location
Saba
Author
Image

Species Action Plan Caribbean Spiny Lobster

Action Plan for Caribbean Spiny Lobster consists of:

  • Threats: overfishing, disease, climate change
  • Management goals
  • Recommendations: management, legislation, enforcement, science and monitoring, stakeholders, networking, information-education
  • Gaps: population and catch data not readily available for Dutch Caribbean, weak island legislation, IUCN designation: Caribbean spiney lobster is ‘data deficient'
  • General Information: description and biology
Date
2020
Data type
Other resources
Theme
Governance
Geographic location
Aruba
Bonaire
St. Eustatius
Author
Image

Species Action Common Lignum Vitae

Action Plan for Lignum Vitae consists of:

  • Threats: overgrazing, residential/ commercial development, historical wood harvesting
  • Management goals
  • Recommendations: management, legislation, enforcement, science and monitoring, stakeholders, networking, information-education
  • Gaps: population size, distribution and trends, life history and ecology, harvest, use and socio-economic value
  • General Information
Date
2020
Data type
Other resources
Theme
Governance
Geographic location
Bonaire
Curacao
Author
Image

Species action plan, long-nosed bat

This action plan for the long-nosed bat describes:

  • population status globally declining
  • distribution: Occurs in northeast Colombia, north and western Venezuela, Margarita Island, Curaçao, Bonaire and Aruba
  • threats (habitat loss due to livestock farming, residential and commercial development)
  • management goals
  • recommendations (for management, legislation, enforcement, science and monitoring, stakeholders, networking, information-eduction)
  • gaps 
Date
2020
Data type
Other resources
Theme
Governance
Geographic location
Aruba
Bonaire
Author
Image

Key Elements Towards a Joint Invasive Alien Species Strategy for the Dutch Caribbean

Summary:

Recent inventories have documented no less than 211 exotic alien species in the wild for the Dutch Caribbean. These amount to no less than 27 introduced marine species, 65 introduced terrestrial plants, 72 introduced terrestrial and freshwater animals and 47 introduced agricultural pests and diseases. A list of these species, pests and diseases are found in resp. Debrot et al. (2011), Van der Burg et al. 2012, and Van Buurt and Debrot (2012, 2011). The rate of introductions and establishment of invasive alien species (IAS) worldwide has grown rapidly as a result of increasing globalisation. Invasive species cause major ecological effects (decimating native flora or fauna populations) as well as economic losses to these islands, across sectors such as agriculture (diseases, weeds and vectors), fisheries (fish diseases and the lionfish), industry (rodents and termites), tourism (roadside weedy species) and public health (mosquitos). Recently in Curaçao the kissing bug Triatoma infestans was found; this is a vector for Chagas disease. It almost certainly came in with palm leaves imported from South America to be used as roof covering for recreational beach “palapa’s”.

Several countries in the Caribbean have developed a strategy to address the invasive species problem already, such as Jamaica (Townsend 2009), the Bahamas (BEST Commission 2003) and St. Lucia (Andrew and John 2010, Chase 2011). Islands are particularly at risk because of a number of factors: their small size, resulting in small vulnerable plant and animal populations, a relatively large border which is difficult to control, a small human population lacking the necessary expertise and resources to take adequate measures. For islands, the sea acts as a strong natural barrier for natural transport of terrestrial flora and fauna, however human activities helped in overcoming this barrier. The issue of feral animals, especially roaming cattle, donkeys, goats create similar problems everywhere: they have a devastating effect on tree and shrub regeneration, which greatly degrades the natural vegetation, with severe soil degradation as a result. This shifts the competitive advantage to hardy exotics and creates runoff of nutrients and silt into the sea, where algal growth and silt deposition are damaging the coral. The new nature policy plan for the Caribbean Netherlands assigns a high priority to the invasive species problem (MinEZ 2013), which worldwide is considered second only to habitat destruction as a long-term threat to biodiversity (Kaiser 1999, Mooney 2001).

While acknowledging a focus on the Caribbean Netherlands in specific (Bonaire, Saba, St. Eustatius) this report sets the first key steps in developing a common frame of reference for the whole of the Dutch Caribbean (i.e. including the islands of Aruba, Curacao and St. Maarten). These islands share historical and cultural ties, partly similar climates, scarce expertise, and experience most IAS as a common problem. The magnitude and severity of the problem is evident and necessitates a joint strategy into which action at insular level can be embedded for maximum efficiency and synergy: a common Invasive Alien Species Strategy (IASS).

Management Recommendations:

The main action points for implementation are:

1. Develop and adopt guiding legal lists for action: Black lists, Alert lists and Watch lists, enumerating the species for which border control is essential or for which control and management actions would be required. A special task group should be made responsible for keeping these lists up to date.

2. Install effective border controls. To prevent is better than to cure: the costs of controlling or eliminating invasives once established can be very costly. For this reason and because of the earlier indicated special vulnerability of the island ecosystems, it is strongly recommended to prevent the entrance of (more) invasives.

3. Establish Invasive Species Management Teams. For the coordination of data collection, evaluation and the initiation of actions, a special team is required. This ISMT team shall have its own facilities and budget.

4. Define responsibilities and mandates. Ultimate responsibility for IAS control lies with the island governments. This means that policies regarding IAS will be determined by the government. However, to be effective and efficient the ISMT (see 9.) needs full mandate to act within the limits of their own budget.

5. Require quarantine documents. Phytosanitary certificates and animal health certificates will be required for all imports.

6. Enforcement. Staff must be trained and instructed how to perform border controls. They must obtain sufficient mandate and means to confiscate and dispose of prohibited goods.

7. Develop action plans. A plan of action needs to be ready, describing the successive steps and decisions that have to be made for key threat species at all stages of the invasion process.

8. Arrange access to properties. When an alien species is invasive and needs to be eliminated, it is important that regulations allow the exterminators access to all properties, private and public alike.

9. Assure public support. Large scale programs for extermination and control, especially of animals, needs extensive public support. Volunteers may prove essential to assure enough ‘eyes’ and manpower.

10. Make rapid surveys. In order to decide whether a complete eradication is needed or that monitoring and restricting the distribution (mitigation) is the best or only option, a survey of the extent of the problem must be assessed by experts.

11. Rapid response. Usually a rapid action can localise the problem to a restricted area or eliminate the first individuals effectively so that no further costs have to be made.

12. Make risk assessments before introducing natural enemies. In case species are already present in vast numbers, biological control is often a last resort. This usually means introducing a natural enemy from the area of origin of the species. This means introducing another alien species, which may become a pest in itself. Expert consultation and small-scale experimenting is usually needed before the potential natural enemies can be safely released.

13. Create an information system. A team of experts managing a computer database is needed. This ISMT team needs to develop a system for easy reporting of new discoveries of alien species, for maintaining and updating information on key threats. The information system supports policy, action and research at all levels of the invasion process.

14. Create a platform for cooperation. In order to develop the system further, a national as well as an island platform is needed for participation of all relevant stakeholders. These platforms will develop recommendations for the ISMT and the island governments, and may also act as support group for the ISMT. 

Date
2014
Data type
Research report
Theme
Governance
Education and outreach
Legislation
Research and monitoring
Report number
C020/14
Geographic location
Aruba
Bonaire
Curacao
Saba
Saba bank
St. Eustatius
St. Maarten